← Back to stories

Three Years After Oct. 7: Israel Commemorates Attack, Gaza Devastation Continues

conflictdiplomacypoliticsSignificance: 9/10

The Facts

Three years after the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack that killed approximately 1,200 Israelis and took 251 hostage, Israel held commemorations at significant sites including the Nova music festival grounds. The attack triggered a war in Gaza that satellite imagery shows has resulted in widespread demolition of buildings and towns across the territory. The conflict has had lasting political consequences in Israel and has drawn continued US military support, while Gaza's infrastructure, economy, and public services have been severely affected.

How different outlets are framing this

The Associated Press coverage largely presents the anniversary through a dual lens — Israeli mourning and commemoration on one side, and physical destruction in Gaza on the other — without strongly foregrounding either as the primary narrative. AP's reporting on satellite imagery of demolished Gaza towns is factual and documentation-focused, while its coverage of Israeli commemorations emphasises grief and communal gathering. A separate AP piece on Israeli elections frames October 7 primarily as a domestic political event shaping Netanyahu's political future, situating the attack within an ongoing national reckoning rather than a broader regional or humanitarian context.

Al Jazeera's coverage takes a markedly different approach, consistently using the term 'genocide' to describe Israel's military campaign — language that AP and the Wall Street Journal avoid entirely. Al Jazeera emphasises the scale of destruction wrought on Gaza's civilian systems, the continuity of US arms transfers despite shifting American public opinion, and the rightward political shift within Israeli society as consequences of October 7. By framing the war as an ongoing atrocity rather than a defensive response, Al Jazeera centres Palestinian suffering and international accountability in a way that Western outlets do not.

The Wall Street Journal's contribution, focused on young Americans who relocated to Israel after October 7, reflects a human-interest angle that neither AP nor Al Jazeera pursues, emphasising solidarity and ideological commitment among diaspora Jews. This framing implicitly positions Israel as a community rallying under threat, a perspective that largely omits the Palestinian humanitarian dimension. Taken together, the outlets reveal a clear geographic and editorial divide: Western sources tend to treat October 7 as the originating trauma around which all subsequent events are organised, while Al Jazeera treats the three-year war itself as the central, ongoing story requiring moral and political accounting.

Source Articles