← Back to stories

Earl Spencer's Book Claims King Charles Was 'Giddily Elated' Night Diana Died

politicsentertainmentSignificance: 5/10

The Facts

Earl Spencer, brother of the late Princess Diana, has made claims in a new book — serialised in the Daily Mail — that King Charles III sounded 'giddily elated, like a lottery winner' on the night Diana died in a Paris car crash in 1997. Buckingham Palace has strongly pushed back against the claims. The book's serialisation has dominated UK newspaper front pages for at least two consecutive days.

How different outlets are framing this

All three outlets report the same core claim and Palace denial, but differ in emphasis and tone. The two BBC News articles take a relatively restrained, process-oriented approach: one focuses on the media landscape itself — noting how newspapers are covering the story — while the other centres on the institutional response, leading with Buckingham Palace's rebuttal. This framing positions the story partly as a media and political event, not solely a personal accusation, which subtly distributes attention between Spencer's claim and the Palace's counter-narrative.

ABC News Australia's coverage, by contrast, leads more directly and dramatically with Spencer's specific language — quoting the 'lottery winner' phrase prominently in both the headline and opening — without the same degree of structural balance afforded to the Palace response. This approach, common in international outlets covering British royal stories, prioritises the sensational element for an audience that may be less invested in the nuances of the ongoing royal dispute and more drawn to the headline allegation itself.

None of the three outlets independently verify Spencer's claims or provide significant historical context about the events of August 1997, and all rely on the Daily Mail serialisation as the primary source. The framing of this as a 'royal feud' (BBC) versus a straightforward accusation (ABC AU) reflects a broader pattern in which UK outlets tend to embed royal controversies within ongoing dynastic narratives, while international outlets treat individual claims as standalone news events.

Source Articles