← Back to stories

US Midterm Elections: Campaigns, Spending, and Polling in Final Stretch

politicsSignificance: 8/10

The Facts

With approximately two weeks remaining before the US midterm elections, President Trump's political groups have spent nearly $277 million supporting Republican candidates, described as an unprecedented sum for a sitting president. Multiple competitive races are drawing national attention, including Senate contests in Maine, Georgia, South Carolina, and Alaska, as well as the Ohio governor's race, which has been roiled by a controversial attack ad. A new AP-NORC poll finds that Democratic confidence in accurate vote counting has dropped from 75% in 2022 to 55% in 2026, though it still exceeds Republican confidence levels.

How different outlets are framing this

The Associated Press coverage is largely procedural and data-driven, focusing on campaign mechanics, polling figures, and candidate activity without strong interpretive framing. AP highlights the record-breaking Trump spending, specific policy pitches such as the $25 million whistleblower program and the $8 billion farmer payments, and the election confidence polling — presenting these as newsworthy facts rather than drawing broader conclusions about their political meaning.

The Washington Post and Politico adopt a notably more critical framing toward Republican prospects and internal party tensions. The Washington Post highlights Trump's historically low approval ratings as a drag on Republican candidates and reports on a Minnesota GOP candidate who accidentally published internal messaging instructing staff to keep Trump out of their communications — a detail that underscores intraparty anxiety about the president. Politico amplifies this theme across multiple pieces, explicitly describing a Republican 'messaging problem,' warning that Trump may hurt moderate candidates in Georgia, and reporting that the GOP's financial advantage is not translating into proportional advertising dominance. Politico also notes a retiring Republican senator cautioning that Trump's coalition may not be durable. Together, these outlets construct a narrative of a Republican Party under internal strain.

Fox News, by contrast, presents a more favorable picture of Republican momentum. Its coverage features Senate Majority Leader Thune predicting Republicans will outperform polls and emphasizes grassroots enthusiasm, as illustrated by its piece on Danica Patrick urging voters to support Trump's agenda. Fox largely omits or downplays the internal Republican tensions, the attack-ad controversy's bipartisan backlash, and Trump's low approval rating data that feature prominently in other outlets. The Wall Street Journal's coverage of the Ohio attack ad focuses on the factual dispute and Ramaswamy's claim of credit, presenting it as a straight political story rather than framing it as a broader messaging liability for the party, as Politico does.

Source Articles